Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults
Noninvasive blood pressure cuffs broadly agree with arterial lines in critically ill adults, but age, weight, and vasopressor dose predict discrepancies
EN Haber, R Sonti, SM Simkovich, CW Pike, CL Boxley, A Fong, WS Weintraub, NK Cobb
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine: 8850666231225173 (2024)
Plain-language summary
We compared blood pressure readings from a standard arm cuff to those from an artery catheter in over 1,800 critically ill adults. The two methods generally agreed, with an average difference of just 6 mm Hg. However, the readings were more likely to differ in patients who were older, had a higher body weight, were on higher doses of blood pressure-raising medication, had lower blood pressure, or had the catheter placed in the wrist artery. Our findings help identify when a simple arm cuff may be less reliable, guiding decisions about who truly needs the more invasive monitoring.
Abstract
Background: Blood pressure (BP) is routinely invasively monitored by an arterial catheter in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the available data comparing the accuracy of noninvasive methods to arterial catheters for measuring BP in the ICU are limited by small numbers and diverse methodologies. Purpose: To determine agreement between invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (IABP) and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) in critically ill patients. Methods: This was a single center, observational study of critical ill adults in a tertiary care facility evaluating agreement (≤10% difference) between simultaneously measured IABP and NIBP. We measured clinical features at time of BP measurement inclusive of patient demographics, laboratory data, severity of illness, specific interventions (mechanical ventilation and dialysis), and vasopressor dose to identify particular clinical scenarios in which measurement agreement is more or less likely. Results: Of the 1852 critically ill adults with simultaneous IABP and NIBP readings, there was a median difference of 6 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure (MAP), interquartile range (1-12), P < .01. A logistic regression analysis identified 5 independent predictors of measurement discrepancy: increasing doses of norepinephrine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.08-1.12] P = .03 for every change in 5 µg/min), lower MAP value (aOR 0.98 [0.98-0.99] P < .01 for every change in 1 mm Hg), higher body mass index (aOR 1.04 [1.01-1.09] P = .01 for an increase in 1), increased patient age (aOR 1.31 [1.30-1.37] P < .01 for every 10 years), and radial arterial line location (aOR 1.74 [1.16-2.47] P = .04). Conclusions: There was broad agreement between IABP and NIBP in critically ill patients over a range of BPs and severity of illness. Several variables are associated with measurement discrepancy; however, their predictive capacity is modest. This may guide future study into which patients may specifically benefit from an arterial catheter.
Details
Formatted
EN Haber, R Sonti, SM Simkovich, CW Pike, CL Boxley, A Fong, WS Weintraub, NK Cobb. Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2024;:8850666231225173. doi:10.1177/08850666231225173BibTeX
@article{pike2024accuracy,
title = {Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults},
author = {Haber, EN and Sonti, R and Simkovich, SM and Pike, CW and Boxley, CL and Fong, A and Weintraub, WS and Cobb, NK},
journal = {Journal of Intensive Care Medicine},
year = {2024},
pages = {8850666231225173},
doi = {10.1177/08850666231225173},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Haber, EN
AU - Sonti, R
AU - Simkovich, SM
AU - Pike, CW
AU - Boxley, CL
AU - Fong, A
AU - Weintraub, WS
AU - Cobb, NK
TI - Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults
JO - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
PY - 2024
SP - 8850666231225173
DO - 10.1177/08850666231225173
ER -
- Publication Type
- Journal Article
- Journal
- Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Date Published
- January 12, 2024
- Pages
- 8850666231225173
- Digital Object Identifier
- 10.1177/08850666231225173
- PubMed Identifier
- 38215002
