The Case of Hannah Capes: How Much Does Consciousness Matter?
A judge's categorical ban on withdrawing life support from a minimally conscious patient conflicts with Virginia law and patient rights
L Shepherd, CW Pike, JB Persily, MF Marshall
Neuroethics, 15: 14 (2022)
Plain-language summary
In our article, we use the case of Hannah Capes, a young woman with severe brain injury who showed occasional signs of awareness but couldn't communicate, to explore how much consciousness should matter in medical decision-making. We examine whether having even minimal awareness should change the ethical obligations of caregivers and society compared to patients in a completely unresponsive state. Our analysis reveals that our judgments about quality of life are often inconsistent and biased, leading to potentially unfair treatment of those with severe brain injuries. This matters because it forces us to confront difficult questions about which lives we consider worth living and how we allocate care and resources.
Details
Formatted
L Shepherd, CW Pike, JB Persily, MF Marshall. The Case of Hannah Capes: How Much Does Consciousness Matter?. Neuroethics. 2022;15:14. doi:10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4BibTeX
@article{pike2022the,
title = {The Case of Hannah Capes: How Much Does Consciousness Matter?},
author = {Shepherd, L and Pike, CW and Persily, JB and Marshall, MF},
journal = {Neuroethics},
year = {2022},
volume = {15},
pages = {14},
doi = {10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Shepherd, L
AU - Pike, CW
AU - Persily, JB
AU - Marshall, MF
TI - The Case of Hannah Capes: How Much Does Consciousness Matter?
JO - Neuroethics
PY - 2022
VL - 15
SP - 14
DO - 10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4
ER -
- Publication Type
- Review Paper
- Journal
- Neuroethics
- Date Published
- March 15, 2022
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 14
- Digital Object Identifier
- 10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4
