Comparison of Fracture Risk Following Semaglutide Treatment vs Sleeve Gastrectomy

Semaglutide is linked to a lower fracture risk than sleeve gastrectomy in people with obesity

JA Noreña, CW Pike, G Hui, Y Motlaghzadeh, DE Sellmeyer, JY Wu, SH Kim

AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes, 12(4): 308-313 (2025)

Plain-language summary

We compared the risk of bone fractures in people with obesity who lost weight using either semaglutide (a medication that mimics a natural hormone to reduce appetite) or sleeve gastrectomy (a surgical procedure that removes part of the stomach). After matching over 2,800 patients in each group and following them for about three years, we found that those taking semaglutide had a 26% lower chance of breaking a bone. This finding matters because intentional weight loss, while beneficial for overall health, can sometimes weaken bones, and our results suggest that semaglutide may help protect against this side effect better than surgery.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Weight loss in individuals with obesity offers metabolic benefits but may increase fracture risk, potentially influenced by the modality of weight loss. This study aimed to compare fracture risk in patients with obesity treated with semaglutide or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) using a large, real-world electronic health record dataset. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis from 2016 to 2023, using the Atropos Eos electronic health record dataset, representing over 161 million patients seen in community hospitals and large practices in the U.S. Fracture outcomes were compared between adults with obesity treated with semaglutide or SG, using high-dimensional propensity scoring to reduce confounding and enhance group comparability. RESULTS: We identified 92 405 individuals treated with semaglutide and 16 082 with SG. After high-dimensional propensity score matching, there were 2887 individuals in each group. The mean age was 45 years. Most participants were female (78.5% semaglutide, 77.7% SG) and White (50.3% vs 48.9%, respectively). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1.9 for both groups. Over a mean follow-up of 3 years, the semaglutide group experienced 86 fractures (2.98%) compared to 128 (4.43%) in the SG group (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.98; E-value: 1.2). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a 26% lower fracture risk for the semaglutide group vs SG, suggesting it may help offset the increased fracture risk typically associated with intentional weight loss. However, further research is needed.

Details

Publication Type
Case Reports
Journal
AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes
Date Published
October 20, 2025
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
308-313
Digital Object Identifier
10.1016/j.aed.2025.10.001
PubMed Identifier
41467149
PubMed Central Identifier
PMC12744784

Document Preview

Open PDF