Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?

Urologists in robotic surgery, oncology, or academic practice earn higher online ratings than their peers

J Zillioux, CW Pike, D Sharma, DE Rapp

Journal of Patient Experience, 7(6): 1062-1067 (2020)

Plain-language summary

We examined whether a urologist's subspecialty or work setting affects their online patient ratings. After analyzing nearly a thousand profiles on a popular doctor-rating website, we found that urologists in academic medicine and those specializing in robotic surgery or cancer care received significantly higher scores. No other meaningful differences emerged between private practice types, other subspecialties, geographic regions, or genders. Our findings matter because patients increasingly rely on online reviews to choose a doctor, and knowing that certain factors may skew ratings can help them make more informed decisions.

Abstract

Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologist ratings on Healthgrades.com. Ratings were sampled across 4 US geographical regions, with focus across 3 practice types (large and small private practice, academic) and 7 urologic subspecialties. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences among subgroup ratings. Data were analyzed for 954 urologists with a mean age of 53 (±10) years. The median overall urologist rating was 4.0 [3.4-4.7]. Providers in an academic practice type or robotics/oncology subspecialty had statistically significantly higher ratings when compared to other practice settings or subspecialties (P < 0.001). All other comparisons between practice types, specialties, regions, and sexes failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences. In our study of online urologist ratings, robotics/oncology subspecialty and academic practice setting were associated with higher overall ratings. Further study is needed to assess reasons underlying this difference.

Details

Publication Type
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Patient Experience
Date Published
August 24, 2020
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
1062-1067
Digital Object Identifier
10.1177/2374373520951901
PubMed Identifier
33457546
PubMed Central Identifier
PMC7786750

Document Preview

Open PDF